Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Michael A. Miller wrote: > >>>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > (Oddly enough, this issue hasn't come up in the 6+ years >> > that the function has existed, and then it pops up twice >> > with little over a week between, see the thread started by >> > James Root on March 26.) >> >> Odd indeed - this issue arises in pairs... >> > <groan!> > Incidentally, I made some fixups for 2.7.0 in pairwise.t.test and less extensive ly in pairwise.wilcox.test, preventing pool.SD and paired from being simultaneously TRUE and hopefully improving the documentation.
2.7.0 is going into feature freeze (beta stage) tomorrow, by the way. You might all want to go and test it, so that we can make it as bug-free as possible. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
