As has been answered several times on rhelp ... the baseline hazard is for a case with the "mean value". It's not a meaningful case with all factor variables. There can be no cases where fidelity>3 has a fractional value. You should be using predict() and survfit() to display estimates for particular meaningful cases. You might want to use a different rhs formula as well because the one offered omits the main effects. Choosing ~bucket*factor(fidelity > 3) would include those terms.

--
David.


On May 1, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Georges Dupret wrote:

Hi,

In the following results I interpret exp(coef) as the factor that multiplies the base hazard rate if the corresponding variable is TRUE. For example, when the bucket is ks008 and fidelity <= 3, then the rate, compared to the base rate h_0(t), is h(t) = 0.200 h_0(t). My question is then, to what case does the base hazard rate correspond to? I would expect the reference to be
the first factor value, i.e. bucket jpc001 with fidelity <= 3, but its
exp(coef) is not one. I verified the contrasts, and the row corresponding to the first factor value is zero everywhere; moreover, I didn't change the default, so a bad setting of the contrasts doesn't seem to be the issue.

Best,

ge

Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(time, event = (censored ==
   FALSE)) ~ bucket:factor(fidelity > 3), data = week.15)


coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p bucketjpc001:factor(fidelity > 3)FALSE -1.606 0.201 0.00624 -257.5 0 bucketks006:factor(fidelity > 3)FALSE -1.613 0.199 0.00627 -257.5 0 bucketks007:factor(fidelity > 3)FALSE -1.620 0.198 0.00626 -258.8 0 bucketks008:factor(fidelity > 3)FALSE -1.611 0.200 0.00625 -257.6 0 bucketks009:factor(fidelity > 3)FALSE -1.620 0.198 0.00626 -258.9 0 bucketks010:factor(fidelity > 3)FALSE -1.619 0.198 0.00626 -258.6 0 bucketjpc001:factor(fidelity > 3)TRUE -0.156 0.856 0.00596 -26.2 0 bucketks006:factor(fidelity > 3)TRUE -0.171 0.842 0.00600 -28.6 0 bucketks007:factor(fidelity > 3)TRUE -0.168 0.845 0.00602 -28.0 0 bucketks008:factor(fidelity > 3)TRUE -0.167 0.846 0.00600 -27.8 0 bucketks009:factor(fidelity > 3)TRUE -0.170 0.844 0.00599 -28.4 0 bucketks010:factor(fidelity > 3)TRUE NA NA 0.00000 NA NA

Likelihood ratio test=294562 on 11 df, p=0 n= 1173838, number of events=
629383

--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/coxph-reference-hazard-rate-tp4602092.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

David Winsemius, MD
Heritage Laboratories
West Hartford, CT

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to