Achim Zeileis-4 wrote
>
> I don't know why you make this so complicated. Either use
>
> read.zoo("test.txt", header = FALSE, sep = "\t",
> format = "%d/%m/%Y %H:%M", tz = "")
>
> which yields a POSIXct time index. Alternatively, you can produce POSIXlt
> via strptime:
>
> read.zoo("test.txt", header = FALSE, sep = "\t",
> FUN = function(x) strptime(x, "%d/%m/%Y %H:%M"))
>
> The former is recommended for use in zoo.
>
Sorry, it's not that I'm trying to make it complicated, but rather specific.
As Gabor said in the earlier post, it seems POSIXlt is not a suitable
argument for read.zoo, and therefore explains the problem that I have been
having. Like I said, I was able to produce the solution that I wanted;
however, it was not as efficient and elegant as I was hoping it to be. When
going through 2 year span data sets, there is a noticeable difference in
speed when you use POSIXlt separately outside the read.zoo function. Anyway,
it's fine. I appreciate the feedback and suggestion. It definitely helps
bounce ideas around and possibly offers ways to expand R source code in the
future maybe. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/simple-read-in-with-zoo-using-POSIXlt-tp4557138p4559760.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
