On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Christofer Bogaso <bogaso.christo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here I was expecting those 2 approaches should give exactly same result > (i.e. same estimates and same SE), which is not the case. Can somebody > point me what I am missing here? > The vector of weights as described in ?glm which from your example is clear you either didn't look at or completely misinterpreted. summary(glm(YY~XX, binomial(link = "identity"))) summary(glm(Dat~Scores, binomial(link = "identity"))) summary(glm(Proportion~Scores, weights=rowSums(Dat),binomial(link = "identity"))) > Thanks and regards, > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
