On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear all and Mikis > > I have the opportunity to compare fits with the 'classical' glm and > gamlss and no smoother of any kind just the same model formula (both > with the binomial family). I get exactly the same coefficients but > very different residuals, gamlss giving residuals which are extremely > close to 'normal' and glm very far...
What type of residuals are these? See ?residuals.glm and its first reference, and ?residuals.gamlss. The defaults for glm and gamlss are not comparable. > How can this be ? Comparing 'apples and oranges', perhaps? > > Thanks in advance for any indication or threat... > > Patrick > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. PLEASE do as we ask. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
