On 19.02.12 19:31, Tal Galili wrote:
The following post would not answer your question at full, but might give
some good code/information:
http://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/post-hoc-analysis-for-friedmans-test-r-code/
Thank you, Tal! As you already mentioned, your interesting post supports
Friedman being indeed the right test for my problem, but it does not
explain why and what my mis-interpretation of unreplicated versus
unrepeated is.
However, your code may help to run post-hoc single comparisons.
Yet, I may take the chance to clarify that my problem is that Wikipedia,
text books, and the R help say different things -- at least to my
understanding.
Anyway, you helped, thank you!
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
