I am not sure...
How do I make sure about that?
esp " Are you sure you were executing the same function after you hit c?"?
Thanks again!
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 06/12/2011 9:47 AM, Michael wrote:
>
>> It printed:
>>
>> c:\R\myproject1\myfile.R#38:
>> myfunc1 step 6,4,9 in<environment: R_GlobalEnv>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> So that set a breakpoint in the copy of the function in the global
> environment. Are you sure you were executing the same function after you
> hit c? If you were working on code in a package, you may have been
> executing the function in the namespace of the package, not the one in the
> global environment.
>
> If that's not the case, then are you sure you ever got to that line? You
> can see where the breakpoint was set using
>
> body(myfunc1)[[c(6,4,9)]]
>
> (Watch the parens and brackets!)
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> Thank you!
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Duncan
>> Murdoch<murdoch.duncan@gmail.**com<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > On 11-12-05 10:32 PM, Michael wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I am in the middle of debugging which is stopped using "browser()"...
>> in
>> >> myfile.R at around line #25.
>> >>
>> >> I was then stuck in a big loop which I want to escape and stop the
>> program
>> >> at the line after the big loop.
>> >>
>> >> In the debugging mode, I used
>> >>
>> >> Browse[2]> setBreakpoint("myfile.R#38")
>> >>
>> >
>> > What did it print?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> I then typed "c" and "ENTER", thinking that it will continue to
>> execute
>> >> until when it comes across line #38 and then stop there...
>> >>
>> >> But it didn't work - it continued the execution until the end of the
>> >> function, right at the line "return(results)"...
>> >>
>> >> What happened? How to solve this problem?
>> >>
>> >
>> > One of the complications in R is that you can have multiple copies of a
>> > function in memory. You may (or may not, what did it print??) have
>> set a
>> > breakpoint in one copy, then run another. Or you may have edited that
>> > function after originally sourcing it, and lost the source reference.
>> >
>> > An alternative to using setBreakpoint is just to edit a call to
>> browser()
>> > into the function. It's less convenient, but more robust.
>> >
>> > Duncan Murdoch
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot!
>> >>
>> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> >>
>> >> ______________________________****________________
>> >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> >>
>> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/****listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-help>
>> <https://stat.**ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-**help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>
>> >
>> >> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> >> http://www.R-project.org/**<http://www.r-project.org/**>
>> >>
>> >> posting-guide.html<http://www.**r-project.org/posting-guide.**html<http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html>>
>>
>>
>> >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
