Dear Researches,
sorry for the easy and common question. I am trying to justify the idea of
RandomForest don't require a transformations (e.g. logarithmic) of
variables, comparing this non parametrics method with e.g. the linear
regressions. In leteruature to study my phenomena i need to apply a
logarithmic trasformation to describe my model, but i found RF don't
required this approach. Some people could suggest me text or bibliography
to study?
thanks in advance
Gianni
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
