A follow-up to my reply below. My explanation below is correct AFAICS, but my proposed remedy using "alternating" is not. Instead(again, AFAICS), one must use even finer control with the "at" and "labels" components of scales.This "worked" for me.
-- Bert On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Bert Gunter <bgun...@gene.com> wrote: > I believe that the explanation is: > > Axes, including tick labels, appear only on the "edges" of the trellis > array, which in your case would be at the bottom of the 4th row. However, > on the second page there is no 4th row, and lattice is not smart enough to > put them instead at the bottom of the second. > > See the "scales" argument of xyplot, especially the "alternating" > component, for how you can gain finer control to deal with your situation. > > Note: I would appreciate correction if I'm wrong about this. > > -- Bert > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Evans, David G (DFG) < > david.ev...@alaska.gov> wrote: > >> using > > > > > -- > > Bert Gunter > Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics > > Internal Contact Info: > Phone: 467-7374 > Website: > > http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm > > > -- Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics Internal Contact Info: Phone: 467-7374 Website: http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
