On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:14 PM, honeyoak wrote:
Thanks for the reference, the each function in the plyr package is
exactly
what I wanted.
I doubt it. You have not looked at the `each` code. Its just a wrapper
for a for loop and on StackOverfolw you started out saying that you
were rejecting for() loops and sapply() solutions because you thought
they were too slow. And you did not want to put any work into doing
performance analysis of your 40 or so functions that you planned on
testing .... so, as they say these days "good luck with that".
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/using-do-call-to-call-a-list-of-functions-tp3906337p3906574.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
