Gabor,
> this is nice, but
> 1) the logo is a bitmap, it is ugly if you resize it
Sure, it's a bitmap, but the naked eye resolution is only
100 $\mu$m so that a vectorized solution is overkilling
in most common situations IMHO. I have to zoom by a factor
1200% to see some pixellization problems on my screen,
but my eyes are admitedly getting older and older, one more
instance of fortune(75) issue I guess :-(
> 2) you don't need a pdf version for pdflatex, it
> handles jpg (and maybe also png as well), so you can
> just use the logos at the R developer site.
Not so sure, I had to convert it a long time ago into a PDF
format for a reason I don't remember. I'm sharing my *.rnw
on a CVS with colleages working under Linux, Unix, Mac and
Windows, so the reason could be that there was a problem
in a given platform. The PDF choice is defensive in the sense
that we are Sweaving with \SweaveOpts{pdf = T, eps = F},
so that including PDF is a pre-condition.
>It would be really nice to have a non-bitmap version, though.
>If it exists.
There was a not so-old thread about this on R-devel:
http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/R-devel/archive/19448.html
Best,
Jean
--
Jean R. Lobry ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Laboratoire BBE-CNRS-UMR-5558, Univ. C. Bernard - LYON I,
43 Bd 11/11/1918, F-69622 VILLEURBANNE CEDEX, FRANCE
allo : +33 472 43 27 56 fax : +33 472 43 13 88
http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/members/lobry/
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
