Mr ". .", MASS::area comes to mind but it may be more helpful if you could say what you are looking for / why integrate is not appropriate it is for whatever you are doing.
Strictly speaking, I suppose there are all sorts of "alternatives" to integrate() if you are willing to be really creative and build something from scratch: diff(), cumsum(), lm(), hist(), t(), c(), .... Michael Weylandt On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:53 AM, B77S <bps0...@auburn.edu> wrote: > package "caTools" > see ?trapz > > > . wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > is there any alternative to the function integrate? > > > > Any comments are welcome. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > > PLEASE do read the posting guide > > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Alternatives-to-integrate-tp3783624p3783645.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
