On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 29/07/11 19:57, Martin Maechler wrote:
<SNIP>
but *also* see the *workaround* for the bug that has been on
R's ?pdf help page for years [!!!!]
--> search for "q" (including the quotes).
Why oh why oh why ... are people always thinkg of bugs in R
when they notice something and
why oh why oh why do they then "google around" instead of just
once carefully read the help pages that we have been writing
with much diligence, and have constantly been keeping current
... aarrgghh.... {mentally tearing at my few remaining hairs ..}
Might I ***ever so humbly*** suggest that some sort of
(brief) cross reference to the note in the pdf help be placed
in the help for dev.copy2pdf?
It's all very well to say RTFM, but when one is dealing with
"clyde" one tends to read TFM for "clyde" and not TFM for
"melvin" with which one is not dealing. In this case "melvin"
is ``obviously'' (**) related to "clyde" and therefore one might
reasonably conjecture that there may be some useful insight
into one's problems given in the help for "melvin". But then
there might be useful insight available in a lot of places, such
as the dark side of the moon. Where does one start if one
doesn't really understand WTF is going in the first place?
cheers,
Rolf Turner
(**) NOTHING is ever obvious unless you already know it.
FWIW, scanned ?dev.copy2pdf, searched the R bugzilla and googled for bugs
against dev.copy2pdf BEFORE sending the email. Looking at ?pdf or using
ZapfDingbats as a search term was not the first thing that came to mind.
We do all appreciate the diligence and effort that have gone into writing
the help pages but a link in dev.copy2pdf would certainly have helped.
Selwyn
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.