Well, here is the discussion I had with Duncan in the meantime...
Anybody else a suggestion what might be the problem?
Greetings,
Andreas
--
http://www.maunz.de
Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we will.
--- Begin Message ---
FFrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 3 15:07:21 2008
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from fisher.stats.uwo.ca (fisher.stats.uwo.ca [129.100.76.201])
by yavin.mogsoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E631F410C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:07:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.176] (djm.stats.uwo.ca [129.100.76.113])
by fisher.stats.uwo.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m23E7IaF028028
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:07:18 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:08:30 -0500
From: Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andreas Maunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [R] Fatal error: you must specify '--save', '--no-save' or
'--vanilla'
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yavin.mogsoft.de
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.3
On 3/3/2008 8:37 AM, Andreas Maunz wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 03/03/2008 6:42 AM, Andreas Maunz wrote:
>>> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>>>> So you have not tried to add one of the mentioned flags?
>>>>>
>>>>> I did, actually! ;-)
>>>>> Increasing the options to "REmbeddedPostgres --no-save --gui=none
>>>>> --silent" results in the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> Error: syntax error in:
>>>>> "ironment <- function () .Internal(environment(NULL))
>>>>> mkenv <- function() .Internal(new.env(TRUE, baseenv(), 29L"
>>>> That's because you're using an obsolete version of R, that doesn't
>>>> support the integer constant 29L.
>>>
>>> Are you sure? /usr/local/lib/R/bin/R --version gives:
>>> R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03)
>>
>> Hmm, 2.6.0 should be able to handle that. Are you sure your C program
>> is finding that one? I don't think it would print that error message;
>> it would say something slightly more informative.
>>
>> You could get it to print the result of sessionInfo() or version to check.
>
> I incorporated a call to sessionInfo() in the startup part of my
> program, just after R initialization. In the case that it succeeds
> (manual startup) version 2.6.0 is found:
>
> R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03)
> i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> locale:
> LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8;LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8;LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8;LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8;LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
>
> attached base packages:
> [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
>
> 2.6.0 is also definitely the only version on my system (compiled it
> manually).
I don't know what's causing that syntax error. Perhaps it's a bug that
has been fixed in 2.6.2, but I can't think of one.
Duncan Murdoch
--- End Message ---
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
