On 11-05-31 1:55 PM, Oliver wrote:
Hello,
in "Writing R Extensions" I found the following stuff:
"Note that these coercion functions are not the same as calling as.numeric
(and so on) in R code, as they do not dispatch on the class of the object.
Thus it is normally preferable to do the coercion in the calling R code."
( Writing R Extensions, 2011-04-13, page 100 )
What is meant by this?
R has a complicated system of "classes" that is visible from C but not
handled by default. So for example, a numeric vector can be treated as
a time by setting its class to c("POSIXct", "POSIXt"). (This is not the
usual way to create time objects, but it would work.)
> x <- 1:3
> class(x) <- c("POSIXct", "POSIXt")
> x
[1] "1969-12-31 19:00:01 EST" "1969-12-31 19:00:02 EST" "1969-12-31
19:00:03 EST"
Now if you call as.character() in R, you'll get what is printed for x.
But if you call asChar in C, you'll get the conversion of the numbers,
i.e. "1", "2", "3".
Maybe someone can explain me the problem in other words?
What does coercion in R do, and what does coercion in C (not) do?
(And what would be needed in C to get the same effect as in R?)
Check for a class, and dispatch on it if there is one. Almost certainly
you'd want to do this by building up an R expression and evaluating it.
Duncan Murdoch
Thanks,
Oliver
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
