> is.numeric(demand) [1] FALSE > is.numeric(Qty) [1] FALSE > is.numeric(Date) [1] FALSE
Doesn't look like they are numeric. I'll try and convert them and check back if I have problems. Thanks Gunter! Thank You Nathan Struckmeier Supply Chain Planning Office 541-864-5029 nstruckme...@harryanddavid.com 2500 S. Pacific Hwy, Medford OR, 97501 Daily Humor: Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door.... -----Original Message----- From: Bert Gunter [mailto:gunter.ber...@gene.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 1:47 PM To: Struckmeier, Nathanael Cc: R-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] FW: Unable to Plot using headers. Are Date and Qty numeric? Check. -- Bert On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Struckmeier, Nathanael <nstruckme...@harryanddavid.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Struckmeier, Nathanael > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 1:39 PM > To: 'stephen's mailinglist account' > Subject: RE: [R] Unable to Plot using headers. > > Thanks for the input. Despite both graphing directly and with "attach" I > am still getting a screwed up graphical output as well as an error. > > My table is object "demand" w/ columns Date and Qty > Plot(demand$Qty, demand$Date) > > Attach(demand) > Plot(Qty, Date) > > Both of these commands produce something completely different (and quite > odd) from a simple xy scatter. X-axis should be "date" and Y-axis should > be "Qty". The table "demand" was imported into R sorted by date. Upon > graphing, the X-axis displays dates but they are out of order and the > graph is a black box... > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] > On Behalf Of stephen's mailinglist account > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:39 PM > To: Jonathan Daily > Cc: R-help@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] Unable to Plot using headers. > > On 27 May 2011 20:25, Jonathan Daily <biomathjda...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I would caution against using attach(), however, if you are not in an >> interactive session. In functions and scripts, errors can often cause >> the interpreter to exit before the detach(), leaving your data on the >> search path. 99% of all attach/detach cases can be handled by ?with >> and ?within. The issue with attach can be seen in this example: >> >> dat <- data.frame(a = 1, b = 2) >> >> test <- function(x){ >> attach(dat) >> if(x) stop("STOP") >> print(a) >> print(b) >> detach(dat) >> } >> >> a >> test(F) >> a >> >> a >> test(T) >> a >> >> > fair point > I tend to opt for the dat$a or dat$b form personally anyway, but was > defaulting back to some of the instructional texts I read early on. > > -- > Stephen > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- "Men by nature long to get on to the ultimate truths, and will often be impatient with elementary studies or fight shy of them. If it were possible to reach the ultimate truths without the elementary studies usually prefixed to them, these would not be preparatory studies but superfluous diversions." -- Maimonides (1135-1204) Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
