Thanks a lot sir.
Regards
Sarah
--- On Thu, 5/12/11, Alexander Engelhardt <a...@chaotic-neutral.de> wrote:
From: Alexander Engelhardt <a...@chaotic-neutral.de>
Subject: Re: [R] Binomial
To: "Sarah Sanchez" <sarah_sanche...@yahoo.com>
Cc: "David Winsemius" <dwinsem...@comcast.net>, r-help@r-project.org
Date: Thursday, May 12, 2011, 12:53 PM
Am 12.05.2011 13:19, schrieb Sarah Sanchez:
> Dear R helpers,
>
> I am raising one query regarding this "Binomial" thread with the sole
> intention of learning something more as I understand R forum is an ocean of
> knowledge.
>
> I was going through all the responses, but wondered that original query was
> about generating Binomial random numbers while what the R code produced so
> far generates the Bernoulli Random no.s i.e. 0 and 1.
>
> True Binomial distribution is nothing but no of Bernoulli trials. As I said I
> am a moron and don't understand much about Statistics. Just couldn't stop
> from asking my stupid question.
Oh, yes.
You can generate one B(20,0.7)-distributed random varible by summing up the
like this:
> pie <- 0.7
> x <- runif(20)
> x
[1] 0.83108099 0.72843379 0.08862017 0.78477878 0.69230873 0.11229410
[7] 0.64483435 0.87748373 0.17448824 0.43549622 0.30374272 0.76274317
[13] 0.34832376 0.20876835 0.85280612 0.93810355 0.65720548 0.05557451
[19] 0.88041390 0.68938009
> x <- runif(20) < pie
> x
[1] FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE
[13] FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE
> sum(x)
[1] 10
You could shorten this to
> sum(runif(20)<0.7)
[1] 12
Which would be the same as
> rbinom(1,20,0.5)
[1] 6
or even
> qbinom(runif(1),20,0.5)
[1] 12
Just play around a little, and learn from the help files:
> ?rbinom
Have fun!
>
> --- On Thu, 5/12/11, David Winsemius<dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> From: David Winsemius<dwinsem...@comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: [R] Binomial
> To: "Alexander Engelhardt"<a...@chaotic-neutral.de>
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org, "blutack"<x-jess-...@hotmail.co.uk>
> Date: Thursday, May 12, 2011, 11:08 AM
>
>
> I hope Allan knows this and is just being humorous here, but for the less
> experienced in the audience ... Choosing a different threshold variable name
> might be less error prone. `pi` is one of few built-in constants in R and
> there may be code that depends on that fact.
>
>> pi
> [1] 3.141593
He didn't, or better, he forgot.
Also, that Allan isn't related to me (I think) :)
- Alex
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
