On 07/04/2011 10:36 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Duncan,

Letting you know then that I just don't see how the first paragraph here :

http://www.revolutionanalytics.com/downloads/gpl-sources.php

is compatible with clause 2(b) here :

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html

Perhaps somebody could explain why it is?

No, I certainly wouldn't attempt that, but thanks for the information.

Duncan Murdoch

Matthew


"Duncan Murdoch"<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>  wrote in message
news:4d9da9ff.9020...@gmail.com...
>  On 07/04/2011 7:47 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
>>  Peter,
>>
>>  If the proprietary part of REvolution's product is ok, then surely
>>  Stanislav's suggestion is too. No?
>
>  Revolution has said that they believe they follow the GPL, and they
>  haven't been challenged on that.   If you think that they don't, you could
>  let an R copyright holder know what they're doing that's a license
>  violation.
>
>  My opinion of Stanislav's question is that he doesn't give enough
>  information to answer.  If he is planning to distribute R as part of his
>  product, he needs to follow the GPL.  If not, I don't think any R
>  copyright holder has anything to complain about.
>
>  Duncan Murdoch
>
>>  Matthew
>>
>>
>>  "peter dalgaard"<pda...@gmail.com>   wrote in message
>>  news:be157cf5-9b4b-45a0-a7d4-363b774f1...@gmail.com...
>>  >
>>  >   On Apr 7, 2011, at 09:45 , Stanislav Bek wrote:
>>  >
>>  >>   Hi,
>>  >>
>>  >>   is it possible to use some statistic computing by R in proprietary
>>  >>   software?
>>  >>   Our software is written in c#, and we intend to use
>>  >>   http://rdotnet.codeplex.com/
>>  >>   to get R work there. Especially we want to use loess function.
>>  >
>>  >   You need to take legal advice to be certain, but offhand I would say
>>  >  that
>>  >   this kind of circumvention of the GPL is _not_ allowed.
>>  >
>>  >   It all depends on whether the end product is a "derivative work", in
>>  >  which
>>  >   case, the whole must be distributed under a GPL-compatible licence.
>>  >  The
>>  >   situation around GPL-incompatible plug-ins or plug-ins interfacing to
>>  >  R in
>>  >   GPL -incompatible software is legally murky, but using R as a
>>  >  subroutine
>>  >   library for proprietary code is clearly crossing the line, as far as I
>>  >  can
>>  >   tell.
>>  >
>> > -- >> > Peter Dalgaard
>>  >   Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
>>  >   Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
>>  >   Phone: (+45)38153501
>>  >   Email: pd....@cbs.dk  Priv: pda...@gmail.com
>>  >
>>
>>  ______________________________________________
>>  R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>>  https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>  PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>  http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>>  and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to