On Mar 17, 2011; 04:29pm Thierry Onkelinx wrote: >> You cannot compare lm() with lme() because the likelihoods are not the >> same. Use gls() instead of lm()
And perhaps I should have added the following: First para on page 155 of Pinheiro & Bates (2000) states, "The anova method can be used to compare lme and lm objects." Regards, Mark. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lmm-WITHOUT-random-factor-lme4-tp3384054p3384823.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
