Hello Tal,

You asked *When is it helpful to use interactive plots? Either for data 
exploration (for ourselves) and data presentation (for a "client")?*

My answer: It's helpful for checking data quality, for exploration with and 
without "clients", for checking results, and for data presenting.

Notes:
(1) It's difficult to explain interactive data visualization in print, 
demonstrations are so much more effective.
(2) Interactive data visualization is fun, both for the analyst, and more 
important, for the dataset owners.  You not only get better interaction with 
the data, you get better interaction with the scientists you cooperate with.  
They are prepared to contribute, because they can understand what is going on.  
That is not always the case with statistical models.
(3) The key is not "animation" but "direct manipulation".  The aim is to be 
able to directly interact with all statistical objects in a graphic: querying, 
linking, reordering, reformatting, zooming, whatever.
(4) You write of point-based graphics, what about area-based graphics like 
histograms, barcharts and mosaicplots?  For categorical data the ability to 
select groups and look at spineplots of other variables to compare proportions 
is very effective. (And don't forget linking to maps for spatial data.)
(5) You mention outliers.  How do you decide what is an outlier?  Interactive 
parallel coordinate plots are extremely useful, either for identifying outliers 
or for checking ones found with an analytic approach.
(6) Interactive data visualization is not in competition with other approaches, 
it complements them.  Results found with models should be checked graphically 
and results found graphically should be checked analytically.  Your comment 
about data dredging is important, though why people think this only happens 
with graphics and not with modelling approaches always puzzles me!
(7) There are often interesting features of a dataset (not just errors and 
outlier groups) that can be found graphically that would be difficult or 
impossible to find analytically.

Have a look at Interactive Graphics for Data Analysis: Principles and Examples 
by Martin Theus and Simon Urbanek (Chapman & Hall).  There are some excellent 
explanations and case studies there.

I could go on (and on), but what you really need is a good demo.

Best regards

Antony

PS Have you reported the bugs in GGobi and Mondrian you have found to the 
software authors?

Antony Unwin
Professor of Computer-Oriented Statistics and Data Analysis,
Mathematics Institute,
University of Augsburg, 
86135 Augsburg, Germany

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to