Federico Bonofiglio <bonoricus <at> gmail.com> writes: >
You're confused by the formatting differences betwen columns. The first column uses 'standard' notation, the second and third use 'scientific' notation -- see comments inline. > > GLU<-lme(gluc~rt*cd4+sex+age+rf+nadir+pharmac+factor(hcv)+factor(hbs)+ > + haartd+hivdur+factor(arv), > + random= ~rt|id, na.action=na.omit) > > > intervals(GLU)$fixed > lower est. upper > (Intercept) 67.3467070345 7.362307e+01 7.989944e+01 > rt *0.0148050160* 6.249304e-02 1.101811e-01 this is 0.0148... vs. 0.101811 ... > cd4 -0.0032133709 -6.566501e-04 1.900071e-03 > sexM 0.9601467541 3.565606e+00 6.171066e+00 > age *0.2436472425* 3.420025e-01 4.403578e-01 this is 0.2436... vs. 0.4403578 > rfOTHER -5.0933264232 -1.198439e+00 2.696449e+00 [snip] > ...check for instance on row 2 and 5 (bold numbers)....isn't something > really weird there ? > lower interval greater than upper !!???? > ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
