Thanks. The way I run it, I can determine what version of R to run with which script. Don't know how to do that with R CMD BATCH.
Placing options(echo = FALSE) in the infile solves my problem. I got that from the page you linked to. Mikkel --- On Tue, 12/28/10, David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote: > From: David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> > Subject: Re: [R] batch file output > To: "David Winsemius" <dwinsem...@comcast.net> > Cc: "Mikkel Grum" <mi2kelg...@yahoo.com>, r-help@r-project.org > Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010, 8:30 AM > > On Dec 28, 2010, at 8:27 AM, David Winsemius wrote: > > > > > On Dec 28, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Mikkel Grum wrote: > > > >> I run a batch file with the following command in > Windows XP: > >> > >> C:\R\R-2.12.1\bin\Rterm.exe --no-save --no-restore > <C:\users\me\file.R> C:\users\me\file.out 2>&1 > >> > >> Is there any way to get only the output of R in > file.out, without getting all the code from file.R too? > > > > Put a sink(file="C:\users\me\file2.out") > > Would probably work better to use forward slashes. > > > in the file.R would be one way but your general > strategy looks a bit strange. One does not generally use the > interactive version of R for batch execution. See: > > > > http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/utils/html/BATCH.html > > > > -- > > David Winsemius, MD > West Hartford, CT > > ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
