On Dec 5, 2010, at 11:33 AM, David Winsemius wrote:


On Dec 5, 2010, at 11:14 AM, petre...@unina.it wrote:

I have the same problem of a prevous request

HOW to use the survivalROC (or another library in R) to get optimal cut-off values?

I want to use the time-dependent survivalROC package.according to the,reference material,it only gives a set of ordered cut-off values .eg.

Optimality specification requires some sort of valuation of incorrect decisions. If you are willing to defend a choice that a false positive has exactly the same loss as a false negative, which is generally not the case in medical decision-making, then the point on the ROC curve which is closest to the upper left-hand corner is "optimal".

Snipped comments about small nubers of discrete values as that was a misunderstanding on my part.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

data(mayo)
str(mayo)
attach(mayo)
ROC. 1 = survivalROC (Stime =time,status=censor,marker=mayoscore4,predict.time=365,lambda=0.05) str(ROC.1)

plot(ROC.1$FP, ROC.1$TP, type="l", xlim=c(0,1), ylim=c(0,1), xlab=paste( "FP", "\n", "AUC = ",round(ROC.1$AUC,3)), ylab="TP",main="Mayoscore 4, Method = NNE \n Year = 1") abline(0,1)

List of 6
$ cut.values : num [1:313] -Inf 4.58 4.9 4.93 4.93 ... *only 5 values

* $ TP          : num [1:313] 1 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.998 ...

$ FP          : num [1:313] 1 0.997 0.993 0.99 0.987 ...
$ predict.time: num 365
$ Survival    : num 0.93

$ AUC         : num 0.888

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
so i dont know
how to use the survivalROC to get optimal cut-off values?(only 5 values)

I really do not understand what you are asking when you ask about "5 values". (I also see that another student GY QIAN in SHANGHAI,CHINA asked almost the same odd question on rhelp about 6 weeks ago making me wonder if there is some online class you are both taking for which this is homework?)

There are 312 finite values for each of cut.values, FP, and TP. Is someone, your course instructor or collaborator, asking for a comparison at 5 selected cutpoints? I generally use Hmisc::describe for quick looks:
> describe(ROC.1$cut.values[-1])
ROC.1$cut.values[-1]
n missing unique Mean .05 .10 .25 .50 . 75 .90 .95 312 0 312 6.538 5.320 5.459 5.842 6.312 6.949 7.966 8.675

lowest : 4.581 4.900 4.926 4.932 4.946, highest: 9.510 9.568 10.185 10.479 10.629


You could programmatically ask what values of the index (1:313) minimizes the sum of FN and (1-TP) = FP. And then you can use to index the TP and "FP" values. I guess it is common practice to call 1- specificity the "false positive rate" but I for one find that very confusing. even misleading, since it's not clear from the term what the denominator for such a "rate" really should be. (It's also not really a rate since no time is involved in the calculation.) At any rate, as it were:

> with(ROC.1, which.min(1-TP+ FP))
[1] 259

> with(ROC.1, points(FP[259], TP[259], cex=3, col="red" ))


--

David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to