Indeed! That is what was confusing me too. Glad you figured it out. -Teresa
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:31 AM, whoppitt [via R] < ml-node+2550409-1571116512-138...@n4.nabble.com<ml-node%2b2550409-1571116512-138...@n4.nabble.com> > wrote: > I think I've figured it out, the AIC column is the IMPROVEMENT in AIC > compared to the null model. So bigger values are better. > > ------------------------------ > View message @ > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/coxme-AIC-score-and-p-value-mismatch-tp2333980p2550409.html > To unsubscribe from coxme AIC score and p-value mismatch??, click > here<http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2333980&code=dGxpZ2xlc2lhc0B1Y2RhdmlzLmVkdXwyMzMzOTgwfC0xMzIxNTQzODMy>. > > > -- ______________________________ Teresa Iglesias Graduate Group in Animal Behavior Department of Evolution and Ecology University of California-Davis One Shields Avenue 2320 Storer Hall Davis, CA 95616 Office: 530-754-7837 Fax: 530-752-1449 tligles...@ucdavis.edu ______________________________ -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/coxme-AIC-score-and-p-value-mismatch-tp2333980p2551198.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
