On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:44 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote: > The second argument to mean is trim. I am not sure what mean(1, 3) is > supposed to do but what it return is 1. > Thanks for the info. On this particular point I find the documentation confusing. In ?mapply : '‘mapply’ applies ‘FUN’ to the first elements of each ... argument, '
mapply(FUN, ..., MoreArgs = NULL, [..] ' ...: arguments to vectorize over (list or vector).' In my understanding this suggests that '...' can take several comma separated objects, so that in mapply(mean, tree[[1]]$node$values, tree[[2]]$node$values) the second object should not be treated as a 'MoreArgs' argument. But I'm probably wrong. > If you wanted 2,3,4 ..., 11 then you > would perhaps do: > > mean( mapply(c, tree[[1]]$node$values, tree[[2]]$node$values) ) > I think the original poster was more interested in finding the mean() by rows. Instead of > mean( mapply(c, tree[[1]]$node$values, tree[[2]]$node$values) ) [1] 6.5 he probably looks for > apply( mapply(c, tree[[1]]$node$values, tree[[2]]$node$values), 2, mean ) [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 although I'm positive there is a neater way to do this. For example, apply( data.frame(tree[[1]]$node$values, tree[[2]]$node$values), 1, mean ) Assembling your data in a data.frame prior to using an *pply function would eliminate the need to write them all by hand. Regards Liviu ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.