If it's not possible to use their particular algorithms, does anyone think it would be helpful/practical to try to write a general scoring system? I imagine a function with arguments for column names, a list where each element is a vector that indicates the numbers that correspond to various subscales, an argument that could handle any reverse scoring, etc.
I am willing to have a go at this if people think it would be worthwhile (read: if someone wiser than me thinks it is not a waste of time). Josh On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Marc Schwartz <marc_schwa...@me.com> wrote: > On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Frank Harrell wrote: > >> >> I know someone who has R code for SF-36 and perhaps SF-12. Aren't there >> copyright issues relating to SF-* even if it is reprogrammed? >> Frank > > > Yep... > > http://www.qualitymetric.com/RequestInformation/SurveyInformationRequestDemo/tabid/263/Default.aspx > > HTH, > > Marc Schwartz > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- Joshua Wiley Ph.D. Student, Health Psychology University of California, Los Angeles http://www.joshuawiley.com/ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
