Hello all,
A friend recently brought to my attention that vector assignment actually
recreates the entire vector on which the assignment is performed.
So for example, the code:
x[10]<- NA # The original call (short version)
Is really doing this:
x<- replace(x, list=10, values=NA) # The original call (long version)
# assigning a whole new vector to x
Which is actually doing this:
x<- `[<-`(x, list=10, values=NA) # The actual call
Assuming this can be explained reasonably to the lay man, my question is,
why is it done this way ?
Why won't it just change the relevant pointer in memory?
On small vectors it makes no difference.
But on big vectors this might be (so I suspect) costly (in terms of time).
I'm curious for your responses on the subject.
Best,
Tal
----------------Contact
Details:-------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: tal.gal...@gmail.com | 972-52-7275845
Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) |
www.r-statistics.com (English)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
