On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
<ggrothendi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Cecilia Carmo <cecilia.ca...@ua.pt> wrote:
>> It wasn't the merge command. It doesn't create the variable x3.
>>
>> CecĂ­lia
>>
>>
>
> How about:
>
> x$k3 <- with(x, unlist(tapply(k1, k1, seq_along)))
> y$k3 <- with(y, unlist(tapply(k1, k1, seq_along)))
>

And here is a second one in case that one overflows as well:

x$k3 <- with(x, seq_along(k1) - match(k1, k1) + 1)
y$k3 <- with(y, seq_along(k1) - match(k1, k1) + 1)

Note that this one assumes that the data frame is sorted by k1 which
in your example it is.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to