Philippe Grosjean wrote:
> Thank you, but I already know that. I am not surprised by this behavior,
> but by an inconsistency between that behavior and the documentation that
> says "For factors, this uses the levels (labels).", which it does not.
> Best,
My gut feeling say that the docs need to be changes. The current
situation is a bit silly because de facto, as.logical(f) is always TRUE
(except for NA handling). However, fixing the code to match the docs
would instead give NA in nearly all cases, and I suspect that has
potential to upset code all over the place.
It is easy enough to try and see what happens:
> as.logical.factor <- function(x)as.logical(levels(x))[x]
> as.logical(factor(0))
[1] NA
> as.logical(factor(FALSE))
[1] FALSE
> as.logical(factor(TRUE))
[1] TRUE
> as.logical(factor(1))
[1] NA
> as.logical("0")
[1] NA
--
Peter Dalgaard
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
