On Aug 12, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Greg Snow wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-
>> project.org] On Behalf Of Joshua Wiley
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 6:31 PM
>> To: Lorenzo Cattarino
>> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [R] storing the results of an apply call
> 
> 
>> 
>> What follows is not really an example.  There is no real data, which
>> while annoying could be overcome, but we also do not have your
>> function.  Last I heard, present or future Greg (I mix them up) is
>> working on a ESP package, but I am pretty certain it has not been
>> released yet.
>> 
> 
> Well, past me had hoped that someone (not necessarily any of me) would right 
> the ESP package, then future me would be able to get a copy and also a copy 
> of the TimeTravel package and use it to send a copy of the ESP package back 
> in time to past (or present) me to use.  However, that has not happened yet 
> (at least not to past or present me, there still is possibility for near 
> future me to get a copy from far future me).  Possible reasons include that 
> possibly future me is punishing past and present me for something that we did 
> or did not do (gotta stick to that diet, maybe that will help) or maybe even 
> something that near future me will do that has not occurred to present me as 
> yet.  Or possibly future me procrastinates just as bad as present me and 
> expects far distant future me to do it while far distant future me has 
> completed the journey into senility far enough to have forgotten that 
> moderate distant future me did not get around to doing it yet.
> 
> While I don't know the exact reasons why I have not yet received a copy of 
> the future working ESP package, it appears that I have created somewhat of an 
> expectation for the package, so I have made a crude start.  I have a function 
> to try, be warned it is very pre-alpha (possible aleph from the Phonecian 
> alphabet which was a predecessor of the Greek, indicating that it needs 
> improvements at least through the Phonecian before even being considered 
> alpha level).  I ran the esp function to see if it could shed some light on 
> this problem and the result was:
> 
> [1] "headline rightly silver foolishness insincerely culpability tuba 
> streptomycin hit clean-cut chateau aerospace diffusely"
> 
> I then ran the function again hoping for some clarification and received the 
> short but insightful:
> 
> [1] "metacarpal sit-down unfriendliness chapel ME"
> 
> Wanting further detail I ran it one more time and was told:
> 
> [1] "hemophiliac phonics dumdum secondary helpfulness proximity strychnine 
> nighthawk waive veggie"
> 
> 
> So you can see the current implementation is still less helpful than if 
> people with questions follow the posting guidelines in providing minimal self 
> contained working code (and the other advice in the guide).
> 
> Sorry this is not more helpful.
> 
> P.S.  I have also started on the TimeTravel package, but so far it only 
> allows for travel in one direction and that at a fairly predictable constant 
> rate.  I have been working on the "Subjective" section of the code, but so 
> far it is pretty boring and only makes the time seem to pass slower.


Two comments:

1. Isn't there a risk of the Grandfather Paradox here? (astrophysics is coming 
back to haunt me...)

2. I don't know if the fortunes package is the right place, but this exchange 
needs to be captured...


Regards,

Marc Schwartz

P.S. Pardon me while I go visit with the Emacs Psychotherapist (version 23 of 
course...)

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to