> I was aware of this option. I was assuming it was not ok to do fit +/- 1.96 > se when you requested probabilities. If this is legitimate then all the > better.
I don't think it is. I understood that you should do the calculation in the scale of the linear predictor and then transform to probabilities. Happy to be corrected if that's wrong. Michael ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
