> The problem is in data.frame[ and any NA in a logical vector will return a
> row of NA's. This can be avoid by wrapping which() around the logical vector
> which seems entirely wasteful or using subset().

The basic philosophy that causes this behaviour is sensible in my
opinion: missing values must always be handled explicitly.  Sure it's
a bit of a hassle, but it being explicit prevents you from making
major errors in an analysis.

In my opinion, the flaw is that R doesn't apply this philosophy
entirely consistently: I think factor and table should default to
exclude = NULL.

Hadley


-- 
Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to