> As for who should do the review, I wouldn't trust so much any user as I > would an organization such as the JSS. If the latter is not possible, the > first alternative is better than nothing.
Of course, it doesn't have to be one or the other, but both could be included. It would be also nice to include: * lists of papers that cite that package (relatively difficult with current bibliographic data sources, but hopefully will be easier in the future) * messages from the mailing lists (r-help, and announcements) * easy access to changelogs (both human and computer generated - e.g. cranberries) * links to buy or find in a local library accompanying books * other packages produced by the same author, other packages on the same topic * packages that dependent on this package, package that this package depends on And I'm sure there are many other things that I haven't thought of in 5 minutes of brainstorming. I'd be interested in developing something like this, but I have to get my PhD finished first! Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
