Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:56:52PM CET]: > On 17/11/2007 5:04 PM, Johannes Hüsing wrote: > >I just realized that the "..." argument in a function cannot be used > >without > >taking precautions sometimes. The following behaviour is what I > >stumbled upon: > > The problem is the way replicate is implemented. It takes the > expression, and wraps it in a function(...) before calling sapply. The > ... in your expression matches the ... in the wrapper function, not the > ... from the parent.
Many thanks! Pose a question, go to sleep, wake up, read the answer. I feel like being in old Cologne (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinzelm%C3%A4nnchen). > > I think you'll need to make calls to sapply directly to do what you > want. > Do you mean to replace "replicate" by the contents of the function? I am feeling more comfortable with my solution. -- Johannes H�sing There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] from such a trifling investment of fact. http://derwisch.wikidot.com (Mark Twain, "Life on the Mississippi")
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
