Well,
 
I agree that plots with multiple y-axes can be very confusing but .... i am not 
sure that always they are also misleading .... One time i was asked to make a 2 
y-axes plot, one y axes was for elevation (heights in meters) and one for 
rugosity (values between 1 and 2 - unitless). The idea was to visualize that 
for a more complex profile the rugosity is higher than for a flatter terrain. A 
correlation coefficient between elevation and rugosity does not show anything, 
although depending which formula you use for calculating rugosity, it can 
nicely correlate with slope. Rugosity is a measure of the complexity of the 
terrain but is quite independent of elevation.
 
I am not sure if this example meets your approval, but i don't think it is 
misleading ;-)
 
Monica
_______________________________________________________________

Message: 49Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:13:46 -0500From: "hadley wickham" <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: [R] Graphics and LaTeX documents with the same fontTo: 
"Frank E Harrell Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: R-help <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=ISO-8859-1 > Yes there is harm. But to make bold lines, easy to read 
titles is fine.> See the spar function in> 
http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/SgraphicsHints for a starter. Also see> the 
setps, ps.slide, and setpdf functions in the Hmisc package. I was interested to 
see that you have code for drawing scatterplotswith multiple y-axes. As far as 
I know the only legitimate use for adouble-axis plot is to confuse or mislead 
the reader (and this is nota very ethical use case). Perhaps you have a 
counter-example? Hadley 
_________________________________________________________________


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to