Personally I think the homepage needs a much better image not a "nice" version of what is currently displayed.
Time Series is completely missing at the moment. Including something from the fSeries .garchFit() routine would be a great to see (well done to the RMetrics team on making it look good). David Merritt University of Bristol, UK Dept of Maths, Stats Group, Postgraduate Student Finny Kuruvilla-3 wrote: > > I've been a R-user for quite some time. The graphic on the home page > looks a bit in need of polish so I applied some antialiased > transformations that Peter Dalgaard has previously posted to R-help > for improving graphic quality. I had to change the margins a bit, but > here is what it looks like: > > http://www.broad.mit.edu/~finnyk/Rhome.jpg > > Personally, I think it looks much better. Because people so often > "judge a book by its cover" (subconsciously or consciously), I'm > wondering if anyone thinks this is worthy of replacing the current > version? I want R to maximize R's appeal and albeit a small > improvement, hopefully this change will help a bit! > > Regards, > Finny Kuruvilla > > -- > Finny Kuruvilla, MD, PhD > Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital > Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT > Homepage: http://www.anchorcross.org/people/kuruvilla/ > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sprucing-up-the-R-homepage-tf4519736.html#a12958155 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
