>>> Gabor Csardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14/09/2007 09:27:03 >>>
>x[ is.na(x) ] <- 0
>
>should work in most cases i think.
... only you probably shouldn't be doing that at all. Words like 'bias' spring
to mind...
Woudn't it be better to accept the NA's and find methods that handle them as
genuinely missing. R is usually quite good at that.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:08:19AM +0200, Alfredo Alessandrini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how can I replace NA value with 0:
*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use, co...{{dropped}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
