Hi,

I have been calculating sensitivity diagnostics in GLMs.  I am noticing that 
the dfbeta() and influence() functions in base R are inaccurate for 
non-Gaussian GLMs.  Even though the help says that the DFBETAs can be 
inaccurate for GLMs, the accuracy can be substantially improved.

I was thinking of writing this up along with a proper fix to R Journal but then 
started wondering whether this is a well-known issue and it has been addressed 
in other packages.

Has the inaccuracy of DFBETA been addressed already?

Thank you,
Ravi


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to