Hi,
I just ran into this 'R CMD check' NOTE for the first time:
* checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE
toto: multiple local function definitions for ‘fun’ with different
formal arguments
The "offending" code is something like this (simplified from the real code):
toto <- function(mode)
{
if (mode == 1)
fun <- function(a, b) a*b
else
fun <- function(u, v, w) (u + v) / w
fun
}
Is that NOTE really intended? Hard to see why this code would be
considered "wrong".
I know it's just a NOTE but still...
Thanks,
H.
--
Hervé Pagès
Bioconductor Core Team
[email protected]
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
