Dear R-devel, Packages don't allow for subfolders in R with a couple exceptions. We find in "Writing R extensions" :
> The R and man subdirectories may contain OS-specific subdirectories named unix or windows. This is something I've seen discussed outside of the mailing list numerous times, and thanks to this SO question https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14902199/using-source-subdirectories-within-r-packages-with-roxygen2 I could find a couple instances where this was discussed here as well, apologies if I missed later discussions : * https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-December/056022.html * https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-February/056513.html I don't see a very compelling conclusion, nor a justification for the behavior, and I see that it makes some users snarky (second link is an example), so let me make a case. This limitation is an annoyance for bigger projects where we must choose between having fewer files with too many objects defined (less structure, more scrolling), or to have too many scripts, often with long prefixed names to emulate essentially what folders would do. In my experience this creates confusion, slows down the workflow, makes onboarding or open source contributions on a new project harder (where do we start ?), makes dead code easier to happen, makes it harder to test the rights things etc... It would seem to me, but I might be naive, that it'd be a quick enough fix to flatten the R folders not named "unix" or "windows" when building the package. Is there a good reason why we can't do that ? Thanks, Antoine PS: Other SO Q&As: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33776643/subdirectory-in-r-package https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18584807/code-organisation-in-r-package-development [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
