I suspect this is as meant, but it is "multiply", the adverb, not the verb. So it might be worth rephrasing, but "multiple" would be wrong (it is about cases where you at one position have several partial matches, not several positions where you have a partial match). "Non-uniquely partially matching", perhaps?
-pd > On 13 Mar 2021, at 01:50 , Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ll. 17-18 of src/library/base/man/pmatch.Rd says "the value to be returned at > non-matching or multiply partially matching positions". > > I think "multiply" should be "multiple" there? > > Can submit an actual patch if that would be more useful. > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
