On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:36 PM Gabriel Becker <gabembec...@gmail.com> wrote: > I mean, I think the bizarro pipe was a pretty clever piece of work. I was > impressed by what John did there, but I don't really know what you're > suggesting here. As you say, the bizarro pipe works now without any changes > and you're welcome to use it if you prefer it to base's (proposed/likely) |> > and magrittr's %>%. >
If |> exists then it will be impossible to avoid it unless the only software you ever use is your own. It's about the entire R ecosystem and what gets used because it is in the base. It would still be possible to implement \(x)... without |> so I would go with that and rethink the pipe situation. ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel