Your report underlines the importance of the checks implemented by CRAN.

In fact, checkbashisms has become an optional part of R CMD check in R
4.0.0, whose NEWS say

> R CMD check now optionally checks configure and cleanup scripts for 
> non-Bourne-shell code ('bashisms').

The R Internals manual at
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-ints.html reveals that
the corresponding environment variable is called "_R_CHECK_BASHISMS_".
It is false by default but true for CRAN submission checks (--as-cran),
except on Windows. The check is probably not enabled for the routine
checks on the CRAN check farm.


Am 05.11.20 um 11:15 schrieb Kocken, I.J. (Ilja):
> Dear R-devel,
> 
> Recently I ran into trouble installing two separate packages, nloptr and 
> ncdf4, both due to the same issue: they have scripts that have the shebang 
> `#! /bin/sh', but have bashisms in them, i.e. non-POSIX-compliant bash 
> scripts.
> 
> I use dash [1] as my shell environment, since it's about 4x as fast as bash. 
> It looks like it's recently also become the default shell for Debian (and 
> thus Ubuntu).
> 
> It took quite a while to figure out what the issue was in great collaboration 
> with the author of ncdf4 (CC).
> 
> Perhaps it would be good to implement the utility checkbashisms [2] into the 
> CRAN make pipeline to help discover these kinds of issues? Running 
> `checkbashisms -f pkg/configure` on files that have the `#! /bin/sh` shebang 
> gives useful information about which lines of code are secretly bash code, 
> with some hints on how to make them POSIX-compliant. The alternative would of 
> course be to change the shebang into `#! /bin/bash`.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Ilja Kocken
> 
> 
> 
> [1]: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/
> [2]: https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/devscripts.html
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to