I wish I had started with "I am disappointed that lm() doesn't continue its search for weights into the calling environment" or "the fact that lm() looks only in the formula environment and data frame for weights doesn't seem consistent with how other values are treated."
But I did not. So I do apologize for both that and for negative tone on my part. Simplified example: d <- data.frame(x = 1:3, y = c(1, 2, 1)) w <- c(1, 10, 1) f <- as.formula(y ~ x) lm(f, data = d, weights = w) # works # fails environment(f) <- baseenv() lm(f, data = d, weights = w) # Error in eval(extras, data, env) : object 'w' not found > On Aug 9, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is fairly clearly documented in ?lm: > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
