On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 10:02 AM Pages, Herve <[email protected]> wrote: > That would be awesome! More generally I wonder how feasible it would be > to fix all these inheritance quirks where inherits(x, "something"), > is(x, "something"), and is.something(x) disagree. They've been such a > nuisance for so many years...
This matter was raised in March: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2019-March/077457.html In principle, I agree. However, I'm not sure it's possible without causing compatibility problems. Not to mention all the disagreement about what's the correct approach. And I should probably apologize for incorrectly suggesting that there was a non-backward-compatible design flaw... ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
