Is there some concrete example of your “many workflows don’t even make much sense without pipes nowadays” comment?
I don’t think I’m opposed to pipes in the absolute, but as I am now deep into my second decade of using R I’ve done just fine without them. As I would guess have the vast majority of users and code that is used throughout the world. Jeff On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 09:34 Ant F <antoine.fa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear R-devel, > > The most popular piping operator sits in the package `magrittr` and is used > by a huge amount of users, and imported /reexported by more and more > packages too. > > Many workflows don't even make much sense without pipes nowadays, so the > examples in the doc will use pipes, as do the README, vignettes etc. I > believe base R could have a piping operator so packages can use a pipe in > their code or doc and stay dependency free. > > I don't suggest an operator based on complex heuristics, instead I suggest > a very simple and fast one (>10 times than magrittr in my tests) : > > `%.%` <- function (e1, e2) { > eval(substitute(e2), envir = list(. = e1), enclos = parent.frame()) > } > > iris %.% head(.) %.% dim(.) > #> [1] 6 5 > > The difference with magrittr is that the dots must all be explicit (which > sits with the choice of the name), and that special magrittr features such > as assignment in place and building functions with `. %>% head() %>% dim()` > are not supported. > > Edge cases are not surprising: > > ``` > x <- "a" > x %.% quote(.) > #> . > x %.% substitute(.) > #> [1] "a" > > f1 <- function(y) function() eval(quote(y)) > f2 <- x %.% f1(.) > f2() > #> [1] "a" > ``` > > Looking forward for your thoughts on this, > > Antoine > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel