I am trying to compile R under a new setup, and frankly, I have had a lot of problems, but I think the stuff below points to a possible bug in R's (custom) configure checks for C++11/14/17, but not for C++98.
This is a report about R from the R-3-6 branch, with a svn checkout from today, revision r77135. In my case the compiler name is x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++, not g++. I denote this in my configure call, using the CC variable. A snippet of the full configure is ../${SRCDIR}/configure SHELL='/bin/bash' \ --prefix="${CONDA_PREFIX}/R/${R_VERSION}" \ CC="x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-gcc" \ CXX="x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++" \ F77="x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-gfortran" \ FC="$F77" \ CFLAGS="-Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I${CONDA_PREFIX}/include"\ CXXFLAGS="-Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I${CONDA_PREFIX}/include" \ F77FLAGS="-Wall -g -O2 -mtune=amdfam10 -I${CONDA_PREFIX}/include" \ CXX11="g++" \ CXX11STD="-std=c++11" \ CXX11FLAGS="-Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I${CONDA_PREFIX}/include" \ CXX11PICFLAGS="-fPIC" \ Where $CONDA_PREFIX is given in my script. The output in config.log is given below. Note that in the test for c++98, it uses the "right" CC, but in the test for c++11 it uses g++. This looks wrong to me: configure:28111: checking whether x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++ supports C++98 features with -std=gnu++98 configure:28130: x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++ -std=gnu++98 -c -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include -fpic -DNDEBUG -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 conftest.cp p >&5 configure:28130: $? = 0 configure:28139: result: yes configure:28315: checking whether g++ -std=c++11 supports C++11 features configure:28607: g++ -std=c++11 -c -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include -fPIC -DNDEBUG -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 conftest.cpp >&5 ../R-3.6-src/configure: line 2355: g++: command not found configure:28607: $? = 127 configure: failed program was: I have similar issues (wrong CC using when compiling the test program) with the test for c++14, whereas the test for c++17 has empty space where the CC variable should be? I can fix this issue by adding a soft link in my PATH from g++ to my compiler of choice. In this case configure finishes and reports that I have full C++17 capabilities. Weirdly, in the output, note that the C++ compiler is "wrong" again, despite my configure call: Source directory: ../R-3.6-src Installation directory: /jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/R/3.6 C compiler: x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include Fortran fixed-form compiler: /jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/bin/x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-gfortran -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fopenmp -march=nocona -mtune=haswell -ftree-vectorize -fPIC -fstack-protector-strong -fno-plt -O2 -ffunction-sections -pipe Default C++ compiler: g++ -std=c++11 -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include C++98 compiler: x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++ -std=gnu++98 -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include C++11 compiler: g++ -std=c++11 -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include C++14 compiler: g++ -std=gnu++14 -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include C++17 compiler: g++ -std=gnu++17 -Wall -mtune=amdfam10 -g -O2 -I/jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/include Fortran free-form compiler: /jhpce/shared/jhpce/core/conda/miniconda3-4.6.14/envs/svnR-3.6/bin/x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-gfortran -fno-optimize-sibling-calls Obj-C compiler: -- Best, Kasper [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel