> ... reports that the fortran names of all the registered fortran functions 
> are “undocumented objects”...  

Those symbols should not be exported. In quantreg v5.33, NAMESPACE has 
'exportPattern(".")'. Maybe it is a good time to remove that and export 
explicitly the symbols that are meant for export.

Georgi Boshnakov


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:06:52 +0000
From: "Koenker, Roger W" <rkoen...@illinois.edu>
To: "r-devel@r-project.org" <r-devel@r-project.org>
Subject: [Rd] tools::package_native_routine_registration_skeleton?
Message-ID: <00702a4f-67b0-4b0c-a791-e72af51c4...@illinois.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I’m trying to sort out the consequences of adding registration for my quantreg 
package.
I’ve generated a quantreg_init.c file with the directive in the message title, 
and placed it
in my src directory.  The first issue is that 3 of the 20, or so registered 
functions have
the same name in fortran as the calling function in R.   This seems easy to 
fix.  More
puzzling is that R CMD check now reports that the fortran names of all the 
registered fortran
functions are “undocumented objects”.  Can someone point me to the officially 
sanctioned
way to deal with this:  presumably I don’t need to document them as if they 
were R functions.

Roger Koenker
r.koen...@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:r.koen...@ucl.ac.uk>
Department of Economics, UCL
London  WC1H 0AX.



        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list  DIGESTED
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


------------------------------

End of R-devel Digest, Vol 196, Issue 25
****************************************
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to