Hello Alexandre,
there are two sides of your question it seems to me:
- there is no possibility to extend the R parser with new syntax. The R
parser knows to internally "rewrite"(*) things such as
if (a>b) print(1) else print(2)
into
`if`(a>b, print(1), print(2))
The parser has a fixed set of functions that get some special treatment
like this.
- there is possibility to implement control flow constructs thanks to
the lazy evaluation of arguments. An example of such function is ifelse
from base.
Best,
Stepan
(*) "rewrite" is illustrative, the exact internal working of this is not
important for this discussion
On 27/05/2019 08:16, Alexandre Courtiol wrote:
Thanks a lot Jiefei,
I had thought of defining a binary operator (inspired by pipes) or simply
using an additional condition in the if() calls [e.g. if(foo & fn(bar))
doSomeThing; with fn(bar) returning a logical], but both are workaround
that I do not find as elegant as a proper control-flow construct.
Thus two questions remain:
- is it possible to create a control-flow construct in pure R?
- if yes, how?
Anyone with more insights?
Thanks
On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 04:27, King Jiefei <szwj...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
I'm not an R expert so this is only my personal thought:
I don't think you can achieve what you want exactly. A possible solution
would be defining a binary operator %*%, where you can replace the asterisk
with any function name you want. The function %*% is special since it has
two arguments, left operand and right operand respectively. You then
can call the `substitute` function to get its function arguments in an
expression format and proceed to do what you want. Here is an example to
show the idea.
*Code:*
`%myOperator%` <- function(x, y) {
x = substitute(x)
y = substitute(y)
return(list(x, y))
}
myIf(i == 1, arg1) %myOperator% {
doSomeThing
}
*Results:*
[[1]]
myIf(i == 1, arg1)
[[2]]
{
doSomeThing
}
I hope that helps.
Best,
Jiefei
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 4:45 AM Alexandre Courtiol <
alexandre.court...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Could anyone refer to me to a good source to learn how to program a simple
control-flow construct* in R, or provide me with a simple example?
Control-flow constructs are programmed as primitives, but I would like to
be able to do that (if possible) in pure R.
The general context is that those functions are a mystery to me. The
motivating example is that I would like to create a function that behave
similarly to base::`if` with an extra argument to the function (e.g. to
include an error rate on the condition).
Many thanks,
Alex
* control-flow constructs are functions such as if, for, while... that
allow for call of the form fn(x) expr to work (see ?Control).
--
Alexandre Courtiol
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sites.google.com_site_alexandrecourtiol_home&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=neKFCw86thQe2E2-61NAgpDMw4cC7oD_tUTTzraOkQM&m=S7ovivpWoG4APCzcwxdRGsn_Rr4FYxNrxmayP5prMhQ&s=LOGFMQPijyvAAyk5wcsWQkM6HjyrNqd9bJTkHhi_4YA&e=
*"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts"*, R. Feynman
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_r-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=neKFCw86thQe2E2-61NAgpDMw4cC7oD_tUTTzraOkQM&m=S7ovivpWoG4APCzcwxdRGsn_Rr4FYxNrxmayP5prMhQ&s=sAVfqnOeGqyqLFdvykN3nfGgEwxOCo7oq3slMwEWKi8&e=
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
