>>>>> peter dalgaard
>>>>> on Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:48:12 +0100 writes:
> Does either of you have a patch against current R-devel?
> I tried the obvious, but the build dies with
> building package 'tools'
> all.R is unchanged
> ../../../../library/tools/libs/x86_64/tools.so is unchanged
> installing 'sysdata.rda'
> Error in get(method, envir = home) : object '$.data.frame' not found
> Error: unable to load R code in package 'tools'
> Execution halted
> ...and I can't really be arsed to dig into tools to see exactly where it
is hardcoding the existence of $.data.frame.
> -pd
Well, we two have been working "in parallel"...
I've just sent an e-mail to R-core about this:
It's really file.size() which does need a 'data.frame' method for `$`
because it is basically a wrapper file.info(..)$size and
file.info(..) does return a data frame.
I've been suggesting the byte compiler's optimizations here to be
the problem ...
>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 15:32 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> On 04/02/2019 9:20 a.m., Radford Neal wrote:
>>>>> I think you might want to just delete the definition of $.data.frame,
>>>>> reverting to the situation before R-3.1.0.
>>>>
>>>> I imagine the cause is that the list version is done in C code rather
>>>> than R code (i.e. there's no R function `$.list`). So an alternative
>>>> solution would be to also implement `$.data.frame` in the underlying C
>>>> code. This won't be quite as fast (it needs that test for NULL), but
>>>> should be close in the full match case.
>>> I maybe wasn't completely clear. The $ operator for data frames was
>>> previously done in C - since it was done by the same primitive as for
>>> lists. In R-3.1.0, this was changed - producing a massive slowdown -
>>> for the purpose of giving a warning on partial matches even if the
>>> user had not set the warnPartialMatchDollar option to TRUE. In
>>> R-3.1.1, this was changed to not warn unless warnPartialMatchDollar was
>>> TRUE which was the PREVIOUS behaviour. In other words, this change
>>> reverted the change made in R-3.1.0. But instead of simply deleting
>>> the definition of $.data.frame, R-3.1.1 added extra code to it, the
>>> only effect of which is to slightly change the wording of the warning
>>> message from what is produced for any other list, while still retaining
>>> the massive slowdown.
>>> There is no need for you to write $.data.frame in C. You just need
>>> to delete the version written in R.
>>
>> Sorry, I did misunderstand. Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>> But if the "You" in your last sentence meant me, it needs to be "They":
I am not a member of R Core and can't make any changes to the sources.
>>
>> Duncan Murdoch
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> --
> Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
> Phone: (+45)38153501
> Office: A 4.23
> Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
